![]() |
Purcell and Elmslie, Architects Firm active: 1907-1921
Minneapolis, Minnesota :: Chicago,
Illinois |
1/1/2007
Another key element in Georgian Place is the plaster figure of "Nils the Gooseboy" (technically titled "Nils and His Goose") by Richard Bock that touches down on a small shelf parapet in the height of the chimney mass. How wonderful the thing is still in place! This is the third version of this work done by the sculptor. Purcell had seen some Bock work in a window display in Chicago and this prompted him to correspond with the artist to get something done for Lake Place in the 1910s. Bock wanted to render a "Nils" group, based on the fairy tale by Selma Lagerlöf, and actually did two, keeping one for exhibition. The piece for Purcell took some time to be made, so Bock lent a smaller work, a faun, as a placeholder. The faun is what appears in The Western Architect plates and a number of the early archival photographs.
Purcell was in his forties while living in Portland. At such a point in life many people look back to earlier times for understanding and encouragement. His decision to move himself and his family to the Pacific Northwest was an effort to have a fresh beginning, and he was naturally drawn to the forest atmosphere there from his experiences as a child at Island Lake Camp. Even though he would design some fine buildings and occupy himself with speculative investments, the practice of architecture left him with time on his hands. His mind began turning toward becoming the writer whose endeavors characterized the remainder of his life. The conscious spur in this shift was indisputably the remembered example of his grandfather, W. C. Gray. A note card of this era dated July 26, 1928, sums up:
There is a post script:
Perhaps they had salmon.
The more you learn about Purcell during this time, the more you know his psychology toward life was fundamentally positive. Despite his increasing health problems, financial humiliations, family disintegration, and seeming defeat of the progressive architectural philosophy that was his fundamental cause, William Gray Purcell took these lemons and made lemonade. Art was the sweetener and writing a spoon with which he stirred. His explorations were not mere distraction from suffering, but a meaningful response. As he had done in the P&E years, through these occupations he sought to make life better for everyone. Fortunately, that group also included himself.
In the Spectacular Good News Department. This just in (and thanks to Larry and Nancy for letting it be so!): Richard Kronick, someone in the Caravan who will leave a useful legacy, travels somewhat frequently for his writing work. Recently he contacted me asking for addresses of P&E buildings in Bismarck, North Dakota, as he was going there and offered to contribute some current photographs. What an underestimation of his achievement! "Bring-'em-back-alive" Kronick has remedied an eighty year old typographical error and rectified misfiling of archival photographs of the house in the Purcell Papers. Huzzah! Turns out that two images of the dwelling appear in IMAGES digital database are misattributed to another Bismarck residence for E. M. Thompson, which means they are misplaced in the wrong job file. A real two-fer, so congratulations, Dick! The original P&E commission list, typed in the 1910s, describes job number 120 as the Carlo Jorgenson house. As Dick pointed out, the name inclines the mind to a mongrel image that is part Italian and part Scandinavian. While that unlikely combination might have happened in New York City, perhaps even Chicago, it just seemed wrong for the plains of North Dakota in 1911. So it was. With door knocked and the way opened, we are informed that the builder of the house was "C. O. Jorgenson," which we can take to be Carl O. Jorgenson. (Dick ventures "Oscar" for the "O."). He writes thus we can attribute our windfall:
And so we have another set of hands to add to our list of P&E Team members. Welcome, Mr. Day and crew. Gertrude Phillips, the P&E Team secretary, is likely who made a boo-boo, one now forever enshrined by the University of Delaware Press in my Minnesota 1900 essay. Still, these moments are to be savored. There are no working drawings for this house, not even the slightest of sketches for this project in the Purcell Papers, but Purcell did have this to say in the Parabiographies:
In addition, Dick Kronick also sent along current photographs of the P. E. Byrne residence, where a sleeping porch is still a sleeping porch, and these will be up next time around.
All told, this update brings several dozen new pages with more than a hundred links. With that, my heartfelt thanks to all who contributed to Organica, and Organicus, in the past year. Correspondence with many of you has brought valuable information, vide above, and it is heartwarming when those who find themselves in LA make a point of visiting personally. May all of us have happy and fulfilling times in 2007. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1/14/2007
![]() Presentation rendering (original is colored pencil on art board) Third Church of Christ, Scientist, project Purcell and Elmslie Minneapolis, Minnesota 1914 New Thoughts for Old. This will be brief, something of a side car. Don't worry about where
we start out this time, for in quick order we are delivered to William Gray
Purcell. Maybe I am the only one surprised. Every once in a while
something happens where, after all my time in the Caravan under the tutelage
of so many fine people, I marvel that my ignorance could be even more than
usually is the case. One such instance is a
recent discovery concerning the DVD movie
The Secret Naturally, being me and looking for freebies, I started to research the various teachers who appear in the film and who make contributions to the book, as well as others in the pond who were not featured in the program but who are players in what is a burgeoning pool of self-improvement instructions called collectively the "Law of Attraction." Turns out this whole thing has roots that go back to the "New Thought" movement that started up in the late nineteenth century. All this was news to me but not, apparently, to Purcell.
Just as organic philosophy descended from the Sullivan teapot through multiple spouts (principally, of course, with Frank Lloyd Wright and George Grant Elmslie, though there were others) so did "New Thought" pour out in divergent directions after being steeped with a variety of flavorings. Basically, and I simplify here to move briskly along, the "New Thought" perspective posited the nature of the universe as such that, at least for human beings, you receive into your life experience what you ask by your thoughts. After that the subtleties begin, but for the present purpose please suffer these broad strokes as background for a point about P&E. What eventually became the movement called "New Thought" proceeded through other students of Quimby's and expanded from the 1900s through the 1920s to a large herd of adherents prolific with their pens. Along the way, the spiritually tasty writings of the Transcendentalists, particularly Ralph Waldo Emerson (we'll be back in a moment), and Eastern spices from Hinduism and Buddhism were infiltrated within a scope of modern rumination that also absorbed the latest scientific developments of subatomic particle physics, a subject we know was also on Elmslie's bedside table. Books proliferated, all dedicated to the notion that the application of empirically proven principles of thought would produce the same results of wealth, health, and prosperity for anyone willing to make the effort. The functions of scientific method and democratic egalitarianism were applied conceptually together as a hinge of opportunity on which every person could turn open the door to a better life. One of the best of the books devoted to creating material prosperity, The Science of Getting Rich authored by Wallace Wattles in 1910, succinctly crystallized the approach:
Welcome to the quantum field. There is much to be found in the P&E design message that matches the "New Thought" writings, just from first glance. Self-empowerment is the key to success in life, and that arises through a neatly democratic expression of integrity rooted in the present moment. And, to return to the Transcendentalist influence that plays heavily throughout, Purcell also wrote a Northwest Architect piece on Emerson, being a literary colloquy on Beauty (January-February, 1942). Of course there are those quotes from the Transcendentalist that appeared in "The Statics and Dynamics of Architecture," the principal design statement for P&E published in The Western Architect in 1913. If you are longing for the Buddhist/Hindu son et lumiere, there's now additional content to the Theosophical backdrop. Contributor Richard Kronick sends note of an important article on Claude Bragdon appearing in the December 2006 (volume 65, Number 4) issue of the Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. The piece is titled "Organic Architecture and Direct Democracy: Claude Bragdon's Festivals of Song and Light," by Jonathan Massey of Syracuse University. We won't hold academia against him. Seems my access as an independent scholar to the Getty Research Institute has been renewed at a critical moment, as their excellent library collections can now be used to open an entirely new front of study unto mine eyes. First, I think I need to stop in more often in the magazines area! Aside from Christian Science, we know that Purcell was familiar with this stream of literature for another reason. One of the more famous "New Thought" texts is Acres of Diamonds, by Russell Conwell. Purcell actually devoted a whole piece to the message of this book in a Northwest Architect article published in the September-October, 1941 issue, tuning the ideas toward the salesmanship of the architect. I'll bet there is more to be uncovered, and I am on the trail. How nice that the side effect is to make me more effective in my own prosperity. In the works, see next. |
|||||
|
Tiny
Something
Department. Since my hobby in life has turned out to be information
architecture, I read widely on the net. Sometimes links show up from nowhere
that lead somewhere. The illustration to the left is a result of a such a
sideclick in response the obvious question, "How much is my blog worth?"
This is a little applet that uses some research datasets to weight
readership. I leave it to the fair readers of this blog to determine what
value is received for time spent. This, and the fact that after being asked
to put up a donation button it still has the same total as the blog, keeps
me honest in a labor of love, I guess. However. Loyal correspondents have learned by now that, in order to stabilize my life after nearly eighteen months of uneasiness and uncertainty following my little reminder of mortality in August, 2005, I have resumed working for an architecture firm in order to avoid another eviction notice and the regular threat of utility cutoff. I have also started serious work on my retirement fund--er, first novel. Add to that my geeky pastime of transitioning the HyperFind™ code base into the .NET architecture. This past Grind has generated more fan mail than any other, and I note that it took the better part of two holiday weeks to get up. There is an issue here of quality over quantity. I do add materials to the site, fix links, etc., often during the week, and the Grinds used to consist of an account of just that in the very beginning. But no one has sent email saying how much they enjoyed reading about keystrokes. I have found that the Grinds work best on a regular schedule. The question is how often can I produce something worthwhile. Even though a crowd of twelve people have voted in one or another of the P&E polls, I decided to create one to determine the content and frequency of the Grinds. So, for those who care, here are the options. Voting will be held open until the first of February. If you are reading this, please click through and let me know what's your pleasure. The server logs show there are two hundred monthly readers of the Grind. Let's see how many vote. Next update planned for 1 February 2007, when the poll gets decided. |
||||